IN RE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. LAKIN, DECEASED. CHARLES E. LAKIN FOUNDATION, INC., APPELLANT, V. THOMAS PRIBIL AND WILLIAM KILZER, COPERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. LAKIN, APPELLEES. In re Trust of Charles E. LAKIN, DECEASED. CHARLES E. LAKIN FOUNDATION, INC., APPELLANT, V. THOMAS PRIBIL AND WILLIAM KILZER, COTRUSTEES OF THE CHARLES E. LAKIN REVOCABLE TRUST, ET AL., APPELLEES.
Nos. S-20-093, S-20-094
Nebraska Supreme Court
November 19, 2021
310 Neb. 389
Appeals from the County Court for Douglas County: STEPHANIE S. SHEARER, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled.
Zachary W. Lutz-Priefert, Frederick D. Stehlik, William J. Lindsay, Jr., and John A. Svoboda, of Gross & Welch, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.
Edward D. Hotz, Amanda M. Forker, and Benjamin C. Deaver, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for defendants-appellees Thomas L. Pribil and William A. Kilzer.
Trenten P. Bausch and Megan S. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., for appellee Thomas L. Pribil in his individual capacity.
HEAVICAN, C.J., CASSEL, STACY, FUNKE, and FREUDENBERG, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This case is before us on three motions for rehearing filed by the appellees, Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer—in their individual capacities and their capacities as copersonal representatives and cotrustees—concerning our opinion in In re Estate of Lakin.1 While there is no substantive merit to the motions, Pribil and Kilzer point out that this court incorrectly found that the check used to pay Pribil was not in our record. The check appears in exhibit 59.
We overrule the motions, but modify the original opinion to substitute language as follows. In the paragraph under the subheading “7.
The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.
FORMER OPINION MODIFIED.
MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.
MILLER-LERMAN and PAPIK, JJ., not participating.