165 P. 1011 | Cal. | 1917
Hattie E. Allen, widow of the decedent, appealed from an order denying her petition for a decree that a homestead had vested in her. We have just given judgment affirming the order. (Estate of Allen, ante, p. 354, [
The present appeal has to do with the petitioner's effort to secure such bill of exceptions. It appears that, for some reason, she failed to propose her bill within the time allowed, and then, upon due notice, applied to the court, under section
The appeal cannot be considered. The order sought to be reviewed is not one from which an appeal lies. We have very recently (Estate of Spafford, ante, p. 52, [
The order here in question is not embraced within the terms of subdivision 3 of section 963 Counsel for appellant cites a number of cases, of which Stonesifer v. Kilburn,
The appeal is dismissed.
Shaw, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred. *358