In re Eliazar G.
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that appellant acted in concert with three others to assault and rob the victim. Appellant’s larcenous intent may be readily inferred from his acts of attacking the victim and running immediately before the others forcibly took the victim’s property (see Matter of Juan J.,
The court imposed the least restrictive alternative disposition, which was 12 months probation (see Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2]; Matter of Katherine W.,