| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | Oct 20, 1892
One Cohn, being indebted to one Feuchtwang'er, had pledged, as collateral security for the payment of the indebtedness, certain stock of the Germicide Company, standing in his name, and delivered, as additional security, to one Isaacs, an irrevocable proxy for voting upon said •stock, said proxy to be used by said Isaacs or by his successors. Isaacs duly appointed one Sanger as his successor and substitute; and as such substitute, at the annual meeting of the company, said Sanger offered to vote upon the stock which had been pledged to Feuchtwanger, and which was standing in the books of the company in the name of said Cohn; and, if his vote had beén Accepted, the candidates for which Sanger offered to vote would have been elected at said election. Cohn undertook to revoke the power which had been executed .by him to Isaacs.- The inspectors thereupon refused the vote offered by Sanger, and accepted the vote offered by Cohn, Sanger protesting against their receipt; This motion was thereupon made to set aside the election, and, the.same having been denied, from the order thereupon entered this appeal is taken.
It is urged that the proxy given by Cohn to Isaacs was irrevocable, because such proxy was coupled with an interest, and was given for a valuable consideration ; and it is attempted to liken the proxy to a power of attorney, which, when coupled with an interest, is irrevocable. But the difficulty with the ■position of the appellant is that section 54, c. 564, Laws 1892, (which was an act in relation to corporations,) expressly provides that no stockholder shall •sell his vote, or issue a proxy to vote upon any stock or bond, for any sum of money or anything of value. Therefore the act has expressly prohibited parties from issuing a proxy coupled with' an interest.
But, if this was not a sufficient answer to the application, another provision -of the same act provides that every proxy shall be revocable at the pleasure.