| N.Y. App. Div. | Jun 28, 1946
Dissenting Opinion
An assault such as this upon the integrity of decrees of the Surrogate’s Court in accounting proceedings involving charges of fraud made many years after the entry of the decrees should not be sustained unless the evidence of the fraud is clear and conclusive. (Matter of Olmsted, 17 Abb. N. Cas. 320" court="N.Y. Sur. Ct." date_filed="1885-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/olmsted-v-long-6141874?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6141874">17 Abb. N. C. 320, 327; Matter of Griffin, 210 A.D. 564" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1924-11-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-griffin-5275844?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5275844">210 App. Div. 564, 568; Matter of Sielcken, 162 Misc. 54" court="N.Y. Sur. Ct." date_filed="1937-02-06" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-estate-of-sielcken-6157069?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6157069">162 Misc. 54, 65; In re Pritchard’s Estate, 36 N. Y. S. 2d 997, 1001.) The rule is the same where, as here, at the time the challenged decrees were entered the petitioner was an infant whose interests were properly safeguarded by a highly competent special guardian duly appointed. (Matter of Hawley, 100 N.Y. 206" court="NY" date_filed="1885-10-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-accountings-of-hawley-3621149?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3621149">100 N. Y. 206; Matter of Gross, 263 A.D. 818" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1941-12-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-gross-5370411?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5370411">263 App. Div. 818.) Formal decrees should not be
Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ., concur in decision; Cohn, J„ dissents in opinion.
Decree and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Lead Opinion
Decree and order affirmed, with costs.