In Re Eakin
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Arthur аnd Dian Eakin, formerly debtors in bankruptcy (“debtors”), have reopened their chapter 7 closed case and move for civil contempt sanctions against Beneficial Idaho, Inc. (“Beneficial”). The debtors had been discharged in the previous chapter 7 case and now seek to have Beneficial held in contempt for attempting to foreclose on their mobile home. Beneficial contends its attempt to enforce its lien was not in violation of the debtors’ discharge.
Beneficial grantеd a loan to the debtors in 1991, and received in exchange a security interest in the debtors’ mobile homе. While a security agreement was signed between the parties, Beneficial’s security interest was not recorded on the mobile home certificate of title. Debtors filed for protection under chаpter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in the spring of 1992. Beneficial was listed as an unsecured creditor in the dеbtors’ schedules. Beneficial received notice of the filing, but did not file a proof of claim. Debtоrs received their discharge on August 11, 1992.
On December 4, 1992, Beneficial filed an action in state court to fоreclose its security interest. The debtors then reopened their ease and filed their motion.
The dеbtors contend the bankruptcy discharge relieved them not only of their personal liability for the debt, but thаt the unperfected security interest was also invalidated. Beneficial admits the debtors have no personal liability for the discharged debt; it asserts, however, that the lien was not invalidated by the discharge.
A lien that is not an allowed seсured claim is void under section 506,
unless
the reason the lien is not an allowed secured claim is that no prоof of claim was filed.
Debtors argue the lien could not be an allowed secured claim regardless of whether a proof of claim was filed because the lien was unperfected.
Section 544 permits the trustee to avoid certain transactions, if those transactions could be avoided by a hypоthetical lien creditor as of the date of bankruptcy.
2
Exercise of the avoidance pоwers under 544 requires the filing of an adversary proceeding.
“This Court finds that unavoided liens are enforceable after the automatic stay is terminated by discharge; thus, creditors with unavoided or unvoided liens retain their in rem rights.”
Polk County Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Weathers (In re Weathers),
Thus, a valid security interest passes through a bankruptcy filing unaffected even if the lien could have been avoided so long as the lien was not in fact avoided.
Beneficial was acting within its rights when it sought to enforce its security interest in the mobile home. There are
A separate order will be entered.
Notes
.
(d) To the extеnt that a lien secures a claim against the debtor that is not an allowed secured claim, such lien is void, unless—
(1) such claim was disallowed only under section 502(b)(5) or 502(e) of this title; or
(2) such claim is not an allowed seсured claim due only to the failure of any entity to file a proof of such claim under section 501 of this title.
. Section 544 provides in its pertinent part:
(a) The trustee shall have, as of the commencement of the case, and without regard to any knowledge of the trustee or of any creditor, the rights and powers of, or may avoid any transfer of property of the debtor or any obligation incurred by the debtor that is voidable by—
(1) a creditor that extends сredit to the debtor at the time of the commencement of the case, and that obtains, at such time and with respect to such credit, a judicial lien on all property on which a creditor on a simple contract could have obtained such a judicial lien, whether or not such a creditor exists;
[[Image here]]
.Section 522 provides that the debtor does have the power to exercise avoidance рowers in certain instances. This grant of avoidance powers would also be rendered meaningless under the debtors' proposed interpretation, since a debtor would not have to meet the limiting conditions of section 522 to avoid a lien.