History
  • No items yet
midpage
159 Ohio St.3d 1209
Ohio
2020

IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF SWEENEY. THE STATE OF OHIO v. KOZIC.

No. 20-AP-012

Supreme Court of Ohio

Decided February 7, 2020

159 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2020-Ohio-1545

O‘CONNOR, C.J.

Judges—Affidavits of disqualification—R.C. 2701.03—Affiant failed to identify any matter pending before judge—Affidavit dismissed. ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, Case No. 2010 CR 00506.

Judges—Affidavits of disqualification—R.C. 2701.03—Affiant failed to identify any matter pending before judge—Affidavit dismissed.

(No. 20-AP-012—Decided February 7, 2020.)

ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, Case No. 2010 CR 00506.


O‘CONNOR, C.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant Zoltan Kozic has filed an affidavit pursuant to R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Maureen Ann Sweeney from the above-referenced case.

{¶ 2} The chief justice‘s statutory authority to disqualify judges extends only to those matters in which “a proceeding [is] pending before the court.” R.C. 2701.03(A). “[T]he chief justice cannot rule on an affidavit of disqualification when * * * nothing is pending before the * * * court.” In re Disqualification of Hayes, 135 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2012-Ohio-6306, 985 N.E.2d 501, ¶ 6. Here, Mr. Kozic has failed to identify what, if anything, remains pending before Judge Sweeney. In an unsworn memorandum attached to his affidavit, Mr. Kozic stated that he intends to file a motion for judicial release in April 2020. But according to the trial-court docket, Judge Sweeney resentenced him in 2018 and no motions or filings are currently pending before her. On this record, there is no statutory or practical basis to order Judge Sweeney‘s disqualification from a seemingly inactive case. See, e.g., Ohio-1826 | 128 N.E.3d 264“>In re Disqualification of Selvaggio, 156 Ohio St.3d 1301, 2019-Ohio-1826, 128 N.E.3d 264, ¶ 4 (“The chief justice will not decide an affidavit of disqualification based merely on the possibility of a remand from the court of appeals“).

{¶ 3} The affidavit of disqualification is dismissed.


Case Details

Case Name: In re Disqualification of Sweeney
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 7, 2020
Citations: 159 Ohio St.3d 1209; 2020-Ohio-1545; 20-AP-012
Docket Number: 20-AP-012
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In