IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BOND. THE STATE OF OHIO v. ROSS.
No. 00-AP-107
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
January 17, 2001
94 Ohio St.3d 1221 | 2001-Ohio-4102
MOYER, C.J.
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1221.]
ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Summit County Court of Common Pleas case No. CR00051098.
MOYER, C.J.
{¶ 1} This affidavit of disqualification filed by David Z. Chesnoff, counsel for defendant, seeks the disqualification of Judge Jane Bond from further proceedings in the above-captioned case, State v. Denny F. Ross.
{¶ 2} Affiant’s primary contention is that Judge Bond should be disqualified from any further proceedings in this case because she will be called as a witness in these proceedings. The allegations regarding her testimony relate to her declaration of a mistrial, pursuant to
{¶ 3} Generally, a judge will not be disqualified based solely on a suggestion or an allegation that the judge may be called as a witness in a case pending before that judge. See In re Disqualification of Gorman (1993), 74 Ohio St.3d 1251, 657 N.E.2d 1354. Here, the record before me reflects more than a mere suggestion or allegation that Judge Bond may be called as a witness. Rather, there
{¶ 4} Accordingly, Judge Jane Bond is disqualified from further proceedings in the above-captioned case. The case is returned to the administrative judge of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, for reassignment.
