History
  • No items yet
midpage
577 N.W.2d 711
Minn.
1998

Lead Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Anthony D. Crosby has committed professional conduct warranting public discipline, namely engaging in and pleading guilty to theft by swindle; and

WHEREAS, respondent has waived his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR); has withdrawn his answer to the petition and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition; and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend a 3-year suspension from the practice of law, with the reinstatement hearing pursuant to Rule 18, RLPR, not waived; and any reinstatement farther conditioned upon payment of costs of $900 pursuant to Rule 24(d), RLPR; compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; successful completion of the professional responsibility examination pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; and satisfaction of the continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; and

WHEREAS, this court has independently reviewed the record and has determined that the appropriate discipline under the circumstances is a suspension from practice for 5 years with reinstatement conditioned upon the terms agreed to by the parties,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Anthony D. Crosby is suspended from the practice of 'law for a period of 5 years, effective 10 days from the date of this order, ■with any reinstatement subject to the stipulated conditions set out above.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that either party may, within 10 days of this order, file a written request for withdrawal of the stipulation as modified and a second referral to a referee for further proceedings; upon such application, this order will be deemed withdrawn.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice





Dissenting Opinion

PAGE, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I would have rejected the stipulation because I believe respondent’s misconduct warrants disbarment.






Dissenting Opinion

GARDEBRING, Justice

(dissenting).

I join in the dissent of Justice PAGE.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Disciplinary Action Against Crosby
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 7, 1998
Citations: 577 N.W.2d 711; 1998 Minn. LEXIS 171; 1998 WL 178647; No. C6-97-2246
Docket Number: No. C6-97-2246
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In