In re Derick Shea D.
Ordered that the orders are reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for new dispositional hearings.
The subject children were 10 and 14 years old at the time of the dispositional hearings in these proceedings. In his written summation to the Family Court, the Law Guardian failed to state that the children had expressed a desire to be returned to their mother. Instead, he simply expressed his opinion that the best interests of the children called for termination of the mother‘s parental rights, and set forth his reasoning in support of that opinion. Under the circumstances presented, we conclude that the Law Guardian‘s failure to express the wishes of the children requires that the proceedings be remitted for new dispositional hearings (see Matter of Rueckert v Reilly, 282 AD2d 608, 609 [2001]). H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.