History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re David W.
249 Conn. 907
Conn.
1999
Check Treatment

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 576 (AC 17313/17564), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the trial court required as a matter of law to strike all of the testimony of David Mantell, the court-appointed expert witness?

“2. If the answer to question one is yes, was the error harmful?”

Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Bradford J. Chaucer and William R. Kinloch, in opposition. Decided May 25, 1999

Case Details

Case Name: In re David W.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 25, 1999
Citation: 249 Conn. 907
Docket Number: SC 16113
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.