History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: David Hill v.
15-1488
4th Cir.
Sep 11, 2015
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on Hill’s April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: David Hill v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 11, 2015
Docket Number: 15-1488
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.