In re Danielle B.

Apr 3, 2012
Versions:94 A.D.3d 757
941 N.Y.S.2d 685
inner_thought * Input: A 3-page legal document (PDF/Screenshots/OCR). * Task: Convert to clean, semantic HTML. * Specific instruction: For multi-opinion documents, convert only the *main* opinion (the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body). Skip partial content from a previous case. * Page 1 starts with the end of a previous case (the one involving “Erra‘s report“, “Kilk-enny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP“, etc.). * The *main* opinion starts on Page 1: “In the Matter of DANIELLE B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. [941 NYS2d 685]“. * Page 3 starts another opinion: “In the Matter of JOSEPH DESIMONE, Respondent, v MARY ANN DELANO, Appellant. [941 NYS2d 267]“. * The target opinion is “In the Matter of DANIELLE B.” * Case Name: In the Matter of Danielle B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. * Short Name: Matter of Danielle B. * Citation: 941 NYS2d 685 (from the text). Note: Page header says “757” and “758“, which refers to the official reporter (AD3d). Looking at the citation “[941 NYS2d 685]“, that‘s the NYS2d parallel. The AD3d cite would be around 92 AD3d 757 based on the headers. Let‘s use what‘s available. * Court: NY Appellate Division, Second Department (inferred from judges Dillon, Florio, Austin, Roman, Balkin, Leventhal, Sgroi - these are 2nd Dept judges). * Date: February 2012 (Based on citations like 85 AD3d 927 [2011] appearing in the body, and the sequence in the reporter. Actually, the document doesn‘t explicitly state the date of *this* decision, only the lower court dates. However, standard practice for these reporters is to include it. Since it‘s missing from the snippet, I‘ll extract what‘s there). Lower court order date: August 2, 2011. Fact-finding date: June 23, 2011. * Judge: Lower court judge Lubow, J. Appellate judges are listed at the end of the text. * Page 1: Starts at 757. The “Danielle B.” case starts after the first two paragraphs of the previous case. * Page 2: Starts at 758. * Page 3: Starts at 759. The “Danielle B.” case ends mid-page. * `Kilk-enny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP, 76 AD3d 512, 513 [2010]` -> `` (Rejoining hyphen Kilk-enny). * `Toker v Pollak, 44 NY2d 211, 219 [1978]` -> `` * `Matter of Gaeta v Incorporated Vil. of Garden City, 72 AD3d 683, 684 [2010]` -> `` * `Toker v Pollak, 44 NY2d at 218` -> `` * `Levy v Grandone, 14 AD3d 660, 662 [2005]` -> `` * `Family Court Act article 3` -> `` * `Family Court Act § 375.1` -> `` * `Penal Law § 230.00` -> `` * `People v A.S., 179 Misc 2d 569, 571 [1998]` -> `` * `People v Polianskaia, 189 Misc 2d 237, 242 [2001]` -> `` * `Matter of Imani Mc., 78 AD3d 705, 706 [2010]` -> `` * `Matter of Brooklyn B., 77 AD3d 934, 935 [2010]` -> `` * `People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]` -> `` * `Matter of Kalexis R., 85 AD3d 927, 928-929 [2011]` -> `` * `Matter of Quamel D., 78 AD3d 1050, 1051-1052 [2010]` -> `` * `People v Delamota, 18 NY3d 107, 116-117 [2011]` -> `` * `Matter of Macye Mc., 82 AD3d 892 [2011]` -> `` * `Matter Darnell C., 66 AD3d 771, 772 [2009]` -> `` (Added ‘of’ in citation normalized form if appropriate, though the text says ‘Matter Darnell C.‘, usually it‘s ‘Matter of‘). * Skip previous case text. * Start ``. * Start `` after the info block. * Clean up line breaks and re-join words (e.g., “mo-tive” -> “motive“, “juven-ile” -> “juvenile“, “communica-tions” -> “communications“, etc.). * Ensure all laws and cases are tagged. * End the document after the concurrences of the main case (“Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.“). * OCR check: “In the Matter of DANIELLE B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. [941 NYS2d 685]” - looks correct. * Reporter check: The page number is “757“. The case before ends. The new case starts. * The “Ordered that...” paragraph starts with “Ordered that“. * The “The Family Court found...” paragraph starts. * Page 2 (758) starts mid-sentence: “... of the evidence. We disagree...” * Page 3 (759) starts mid-sentence: “Here, even accepting...” * The case ends with “Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.” * Jurisdiction: NY. * NYS2d parallel: 941 N.Y.S.2d 685. * AD3d cite: 92 AD3d 757 (inferring from the header). * Court: NY Appellate Division, Second Department (N.Y. App. Div.). Wait, the instructions say “multi-opinion documents... convert only the MAIN opinion — the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body. Skip partial content from a previous case“. Since the document contains the end of Case A, Case B (complete), and the start of Case C, I must convert only Case B. *Case B Info:* Name: In the Matter of Danielle B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Citation: 92 AD3d 757, 941 NYS2d 685. Docket: Not explicitly listed as “No. X“, but the caption style is standard NY Appellate. Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York. Judges: Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ. *Tagging:* - `Family Court Act article 3` -> `N.Y. Fam. Ct. Act art. 3` - `Penal Law § 230.00` -> `N.Y. Penal Law § 230.00` - `Matter of Imani Mc., 78 AD3d 705` - `Matter of Brooklyn B., 77 AD3d 934` - `People v A.S., 179 Misc 2d 569` - `People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490` - `Matter of Kalexis R., 85 AD3d 927` - `Matter of Quamel D., 78 AD3d 1050` - `People v Delamota, 18 NY3d 107` - `Matter of Macye Mc., 82 AD3d 892` - `Matter Darnell C., 66 AD3d 771` *Note on rejoining words:* Page 1: “mo-tive” (previous case), “communica-tions” (previous case), “juve-nile“, “pro-ceedings“. Page 2: “commit-ted“, “consti-tuted“, “en-gage[d]“, “agree-ment“, “delin-quency“, “commis-sion“, “reason-able“, “prostitu-tion“. Page 3: “determi-nation“, “ap-pellant“, “offi-cer“, “circum-stances“. Let‘s assemble.