History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Crowly
50 F. 465
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1892
Check Treatment
Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Crowly
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Date Published: Feb 25, 1892
Citation: 50 F. 465
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.