In re Cordero D.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that, notwithstanding petitioner‘s diligent efforts to schedule visitation and refer respondent to therapy, respondent failed to attend a substantial number of visits, refused most referrals, and gained no insight into the problems that led to the removal of the children (
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.