History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Corbin
89 N.Y.S. 1102
N.Y. App. Div.
1904
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Reargument ordered,'upon a day for the hearing of enumerated motions, to be agreed upon by counsel, at the next term, upon the following questions: (1) Whether the proof shows any warrant for the payments made on account of the Sunnyside Company beyond the repayment to the Corbin Banking Company of the overdraft paid before Mr. Corbin’s death. (2) Whether the proof suffices to establish a contract between Mr. Corbin and Mr. Pratt, enforceable after Mr. Corbin’s death, for the purchase of the Long Island Railroad Company’s stock. (3) Whether, in view of the fact that Mrs. Corbin’s life estate in the Fifth avenue property was restored to her, the taxes and expenses of maintenance were legally chargeable against Mr. Corbin’s estate..

Case Details

Case Name: In re Corbin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 28, 1904
Citation: 89 N.Y.S. 1102
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.