History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Conghua Yan v. the State of Texas
02-25-00548-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 31, 2025
|
Check Treatment

*1 In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00548-CV ___________________________ I N RE C ONGHUA Y AN , Relator

Original Proceeding 360th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 325-707596-21 Before Bassel, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

*2 The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied .

We hereby lift our October 21, 2025 stay of the trial court’s hearing on the receiver’s motion to confirm the sale of real property. Real party in interest’s motion s to strike improper correspondence and to prohibit future filings is denied. We will carry t he real party in interest’s motion s for sanctions under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.11 for future reconsideration as warranted in this case.

Per Curiam Delivered: October 31, 2025 2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Conghua Yan v. the State of Texas
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 31, 2025
Docket Number: 02-25-00548-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Add Column
No results found

Notebook

Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.

What are you researching?

Are reduced-form regression models acceptable evidence of class-wide impact at the class certification stage?
If Delaware is a company's place of incorporation, is that enough to establish personal jurisdiction and venue in Delaware?
What is the meaning of "after the pleadings are closed" in rule 12c of the frcp? Do pleadings include motions to dismiss counterclaims? Preferred jurisdiction is MA District court, but would take anything from the 1st circuit.