History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re C.L.C.
360 N.C. 475
N.C.
2006
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.L.C.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 2006
Citation: 360 N.C. 475
Docket Number: No. 467A05
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.