History
  • No items yet
midpage
137 So. 3d 11
La.
2014

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, and failed to promptly refund an unearned fee. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent refunded the fee and thereafter she and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Sonceree Smith Clark, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19275, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Apr 4, 2014
Citations: 137 So. 3d 11; 2014 La. LEXIS 762; 2014 WL 1343270; No. 2014-B-0518
Docket Number: No. 2014-B-0518
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In