History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Cheney Bros.
218 A.D. 652
N.Y. App. Div.
1926
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to compel arbitration *653denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the question as to whether or not the contract was fraudulently induced raises an issue of fact which must be tried before the right to arbitration under the contract may be enforced. If the contract was voided by fraud, the arbitration provision therein falls.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Cheney Bros.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 31, 1926
Citation: 218 A.D. 652
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.