In re Casey J.
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that respondent, by reason of mental illness, is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for his child (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]; Matter of Jarred R.,
Family Court did not err in failing to appoint a guardian ad litem for respondent. There is no evidence tending to show that respondent, who was present at the fact-finding hearing with his attorney, was incapable of adequately defending his rights (see, Urban Pathways v Lublin,