In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Williams
957 N.E.2d 289
Ohio
2011
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108. The judgments of the courts of appeals are reversed, and the causes are remanded for application of Williams.

{¶ 2} 2009-0045. State v. Swank, Lake App. No. 2008-L-019, 2008-Ohio-6059, 2008 WL 4964659.

{¶ 3} 2009-0150. State v. Countryman, Washington App. No. 08CA12, 2008-Ohio-6700, 2008 WL 5265679.

{¶ 4} 2009-0454. State v. Fisher, Summit App. No. 24116, 2009-Ohio-332, 2009 WL 187958.

{¶ 5} 2009-0560. State v. Rabel, Cuyahoga App. No. 91280, 2009-Ohio-350, 2009 WL 205865.

{¶ 6} 2009-0645. Holcomb v. State, Logan App. Nos. 8-08-23, 8-08-24, 8-08-25, and 8-08-26, 2009-Ohio-782, 2009 WL 427616.

{¶ 7} 2009-0777. State v. Gilfillan, Franklin App. No. 08AP-317, 2009-Ohio-1104, 2009 WL 638264.

{¶ 8} 2009-0840. State v. Hartman, Cuyahoga App. No. 91040, 2009-Ohio-1069, 2009 WL 626089.

{¶ 9} 2009-0863. State v. Omiecinski, Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066, 2009 WL 626114.

{¶ 10} 2009-1024. State v. Blanchard, Cuyahoga App. No. 90935, 2009-Ohio-1357, 2009 WL 792360.

{¶ 11} 2009-1049. Toney v. State, 182 Ohio App.3d 331, 2009-Ohio-1881, 912 N.E.2d 1137.

{¶ 12} 2009-1227. State v. Franklin, 182 Ohio App.3d 410, 2009-Ohio-2664, 912 N.E.2d 1197.

{¶ 13} 2009-1419. State v. Irvin, Ross App. No. 08CA3057, 2009-Ohio-3128, 2009 WL 1830759.

{¶ 14} 2009-1493. State v. Gresham, Montgomery App. No. 22766, 2009-Ohio-3305, 2009 WL 1914619.

{¶ 15} 2009-1588. State v. Marks, Ashtabula App. No. 2008-A-0048, 2009-Ohio-3790, 2009 WL 2356812.

{¶ 16} 2009-1604. State v. Day, Adams App. Nos. 08CA865 and 08CA866, 2009-Ohio-3755, 2009 WL 2332084.

{¶ 17} 2009-1716. State v. Irvin, Ross App. No. 08CA3056, 2009-Ohio-4181, 2009 WL 2521215.

{¶ 18} 2009-1811. McGuire v. State, Richland App. No. 08 CA 227, 2009-Ohio-4397, 2009 WL 2625843.

{¶ 19} 2009-1844. State v. Howard, Ross App. No. 08CA 3086, 2009-Ohio-4496, 2009 WL 2762760.

{¶ 20} 2009-2200. State v. Kenney, Franklin App. No. 09AP-231, 2009-Ohio-5584, 2009 WL 3401753.

{¶ 21} 2010-0289. Caes v. State, Warren App. No. CA2009-07-095, 2009-Ohio-6920, 2009 WL 5155092.

{¶ 22} 2010-0329. State v. Taylor, Athens App. No. 09CA22, 2010-Ohio-141, 2010 WL 200835.

{¶ 23} 2010-0627. Boernke v. State, Warren App. No. CA2009-06-070, 2010-Ohio-737, 2010 WL 705167.

{¶ 24} 2010-1882. Green v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090650, 2010-Ohio-4371, 2010 WL 3610203.

{¶ 25} 2010-1911. Young v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090771.

{¶ 26} 2010-1914. Feltha v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090796.

{¶ 27} 2010-1915. Beck v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090891.

{¶ 28} 2010-1917. Phifer v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090861.

{¶ 29} 2010-1942. Sparks v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-100063.

{¶ 30} 2010-2157. Mitchell v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-100061.

{¶ 31} 2011-0226. State v. Wade, Franklin App. No. 10AP-159, 2010-Ohio-6395, 2010 WL 5543880.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would affirm the judgments of the courts of appeals.

{¶ 32} The following case was held for the decision in State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108. It is hereby dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 33} 2009-1858. State v. Menton, Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 70, 2009-Ohio-4640, 2009 WL 2859276.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

{¶ 34} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108. They are hereby dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 35} 2011-0312. Hartley v. State, Licking App. No. 10 CA 65, 2011-Ohio-96, 2011 WL 198997.

{¶ 36} 2011-0442. Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10 CA 49, 2010-Ohio-6074, 2010 WL 5110082.

{¶ 37} 2011-0586. Core v. State, 191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292, 947 N.E.2d 250.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
Read the detailed case summary