In re Carolyn F.
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner Orange County Department of Social Services showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the father had violated the terms and conditions of a “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Order of Disposition, Suspended Judgment” dated March 7, 2007 (see Matter of Michael Phillip T., 44 AD3d 1062, 1063 [2007]). Contrary to the father‘s contention, the petitioner was not required to prove that it made diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship, because the father
Fisher, J.P., Covello, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.