History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Carmichael
36 Ala. 616
Ala.
1860
Check Treatment
.STONE, J.

The witness should not have been allowed to testify that, in his opinion, John E. Carmichael was incompetent to manage his affairs and take care of himself. Walker v. Walker, 34 Ala. 469 ; Hall v. Goodson, 32 Ala. 277; Stubbs v. Houston, 33 Ala. 555.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Carmichael
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 15, 1860
Citation: 36 Ala. 616
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.