History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Carlton
7 Cow. 471
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1827
Check Treatment
Curia, per Savage, Ch. J.

By the act of congress, the enlistment is void; and the soldier ought to be discharged, if this court have jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction, unless it has been expressly surrendered or taken away. Any person illegally detained, has a right to be discharged, and it is the duty of this court to restore him to his liberty. No act of congress, or of this state, has forbidden the exercise of this common law jurisdiction. It ought, therefore, to be *applied. The authorities referred to by the recorder, especially those of Massachusetts, sustain our view of the *472ease. We are of opinion that Carlton should be discharged by the recorder, whose power upon this writ is the same with 0urs.[1]

See New York Dig. vol. 2, tit. Habeas Corpus.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Carlton
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1827
Citation: 7 Cow. 471
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.