In re Carliesha C.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent violated the conditions of her probation by failing to pay restitution (see generally Matter of Amanda RR., 230 AD2d 451, 453 [1997]). We reject the contention of respondent that Family Court lacked authority to issue a dispositional order placing her on probation for an additional one-year period after the original period of probation would have expired. The violation petition was timely filed prior to the expiration of the original period of probation (cf. Matter of Felix R., 265 AD2d 227, 228 [1999]), thereby interrupting that period of probation pending the court’s final determination on the violation petition (see
Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Pine and Lawton, JJ.