History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Capraro
1935 N.J. LEXIS 593
| N.J. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Reserving the question whether the next of kin may recover their shares from the administrator "in chancery only," the decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the late and venerable jurist, Vice-Chancellor John H. Backes, as vice-ordinary, and reported in 116 N.J. Eq. 259.

With the stated reservation the decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 83

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Capraro
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 9, 1935
Citation: 1935 N.J. LEXIS 593
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.