History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re C.T.
984 N.E.2d 1055
Ohio
2012
Check Treatment

IN RE C.T.

No. 2012-0915

Supreme Court of Ohio

December 14, 2012

135 Ohio St.3d 133, 2012-Ohio-5886

Submitted December 11, 2012

Robert L. Schwartz, pro se.

{¶ 1} On September 5, 2012, this discretionary appeal was accepted on propositions of law No. I and II and held for this court‘s decisions in State v. Williams, 134 Ohio St.3d 521, 2012-Ohio-5695, 983 N.E.2d 1278, and State v. Sutton, case No. 2012-0098, on appeal from 8th Dist. No. 96408, 2011-Ohio-6270, 2011 WL 6152954, appeal dismissed, 132 Ohio St.3d 1529, 2012-Ohio-4381, 974 N.E.2d 1207.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

KENNEDY, J., not participating.

Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Law Office of Joseph J. Lanter, L.L.C., and Joseph Lanter, for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.T.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 14, 2012
Citation: 984 N.E.2d 1055
Docket Number: 2012-0915
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In