midpage

In re C.L.C.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 5, 2006
No. 467A05
Versions:360 N.C. 475
628 S.E.2d 760
2006 N.C. LEXIS 37
PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.L.C.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 2006
Citations: 360 N.C. 475; 628 S.E.2d 760; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37; No. 467A05
Docket Number: No. 467A05
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In