midpage

In re C.L.C.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 5, 2006
No. 467A05
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Consideration
PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‍right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‍decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‍for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‍DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‍consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.L.C.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 2006
Citations: 360 N.C. 475; 628 S.E.2d 760; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37; No. 467A05
Docket Number: No. 467A05
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In