History
  • No items yet
midpage
360 N.C. 475
N.C.
2006
PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: In re C.L.C.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 5, 2006
Citations: 360 N.C. 475; 628 S.E.2d 760; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37; No. 467A05
Docket Number: No. 467A05
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    In re C.L.C., 360 N.C. 475