1 Alaska 111 | D. Alaska | 1900
The petition of Samuel Burton states that he is a native of British Columbia, now and for many years a resident of Alaska, and he prays to be admitted to citizenship in the United States.
Section 8, art. 1, of the Constitution of the United States, provides that Congress shall have the power “to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.” In exercising this right, Congress has enacted that a free white person, or an alien of African nativity or of African descent, may be admitted to citizenship. This is the uniform rule established by Congress under the Constitution.
Indians sustaining tribal relations have never, so far as this court is advised, been permitted to exercise the rights of citizenship. By the treaty of cession between the United States and Russia it is provided that “the uncivilized tribes will be subject to such laws and regulations as the United States may from time to time adopt in regard to aboriginal tribes of that country.” In legislation by Congress we do not find any indication that Congress intends to deal differently with the Indians of Alaska than with any of the aboriginal tribes within the territorial limits of the United States.
In the late acts of Congress affecting Alaska, particularly the act of 1899 (Act March 3, 1899, c. 429, 30 Stat. 1338), giving Alaska a Criminal Code, and fixing a license fee to be paid by those engaging in various kinds of business in Alaska, and, among other things, providing for license to retail liquor dealers, a sale of liquor “to any minor, Indian, or intoxicated person, or to a habitual drunkard” is prohibited under heavy penalty. It will be observed that here the Indian is protected under the law the same as a minor or intoxicated person.
Again, the act providing for a license to retail liquor dealers, requires, as a condition precedent to the issue thereof, the consent of “a majority of the white male and female resi
The act of June 6, 1900, commonly known as the “Carter Act,” at section 27 (31 Stat. 330) thereof, refers to “Indian lands,” “missions,” etc., thereby giving certain protection to. them as a race or peculiar people, and in no way treating them, or any of them, as persons having the rights of citizens of the United States.
It was at one time the practice of our government to enter into contract with certain Indian tribes by treaty, but in 1871 it was enacted that “no Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged or recognized as an independent nation, tribe, or power, with whom the United States may contract by treaty.” Rev. St. U. S. § 2079.
Section 2103, Rev. St. U. S., seems to indicate that under some circumstances an Indian may acquire the rights of citizenship. By the act of February 8, 1887 (24 Stat. 388), it is provided that allotment of land may be made to Indians, and by section 6 of said act it is further provided that an Indian born within the United States, to whom land has been allotted, and who has severed his'tribal relations, and adopted the habits of civilized life, thereby becomes a citizen of the United States, and is entitled to all the rights, privileges, and immunities of such citizenship. This seems to be the only method provided by law whereby an Indian may become a citizen.
It will be seen, from an examination of the acts of Congress above referred to, and many others not cited, that prior to the act of Congress in 1871 it was the practice of our government to treat with Indian tribes much as we treat with foreign or independent nations, and quite generally as with
No provision has been made by Congress for the naturalization of Indians or other peoples of color or their descendants, except Africans.
. Burton is an Indian, and, if born within the territorial limits of the United States, and having severed his tribal relations, adopted the habits of civilized life, and otherwise complied'with the law above referred to, then he is a citizen of the United States by the declaration of the statute, and needs no papers from the court. If he was not born within the territorial limits of the United States, but in British Columbia, as asserted by him, having no rights of citizenship there, and treated under the law of that government as an Indian without civil rights, then there is no law of the United States, of which this court is advised, whereby he mav be admitted to citizenship by the court.
The application is therefore denied.
