History
  • No items yet
midpage
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16
Ohio
1960
Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of petitioner. Petitioner could have objected to alleged irregularities in the indictment before trial, had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the other alleged errors or irregularities of *17which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Bryant
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 18, 1960
Citations: 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16; 171 Ohio St. 16; No. 36313
Docket Number: No. 36313
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    In re Bryant, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16