In re Brett W.
The only аrguments advanced on appeal concern rеspondent‘s placement. That is, respondent claims thаt it was not the least restrictive alternative available, and he further claims that he wаs not given appropriаte credit for time served in а detention facility prior to placement. Inasmuch as the dispositional order expired by its own terms in August 2008, these claims are moot (see Matter of Andrew MM., 24 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2005]; Matter of Mark J., 259 AD2d 40, 43-44 [1999]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
Rose, J.P., Kane, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.