midpage

In Re Barnes

California Court of Appeal
Nov 28, 1932
Docket No. 2295.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Works

[1] Petitioner is in custody under an alleged conviction on a criminal charge before a justice of the peace, petitioner‘s contention being that the docket of the ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‍justice fails to show that petitioner had a trial before the judgment of conviction was rendered.

At the oral argument respondent was permitted to file an amended return to the ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‍writ, by which it was shown that since the issuance of the writ the justice had corrected the docket to show that a trial actually occurred. Petitioner contends that ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‍a justice of the peace may not amend his docket at such a stage. This contention cannot be upheld. (See In re Glavich, 74 Cal.App. 144 [239 P. 707].)

The writ is ‍​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‍discharged and the petitioner is remanded to custody.

Craig, J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Barnes
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 28, 1932
Citations: 127 Cal. App. 708; 16 P.2d 309; 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 329; Docket No. 2295.
Docket Number: Docket No. 2295.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In