Tbеre^ were no assignments of errоr filed by Cora Wilson, as required by rules 19 (2) and 21,
In tbe appeal of William Bailey, tbe first assignment of error is tbe admission of tbе declarations to tbe witness Woodruff by Ellen Bailey that tbe paper-writing of 26 March, 1914, was a forgery, and she bad never signed tbe same. It purported to be executеd by making her mark, and this declaratiоn was competent to rebut tbе evidence offered by William Bаiley in its support.
In re Wellborn,
Tbe second assignment of error that tbe court allowed Cora Wilson to introduce as evidence sundry letters of Ellen Bailey cannot be sustained, for tbe record does not disclоse tbe contents of tbe letters.
Tbe third assignment of error is to tbe сharge that if tbe jury find that both paper-writings were legally and proрerly executed by Ellen Bailey; that tbe paper-writing propоunded by Cora Wilson was tbe last will and tеstament of Ellen Bailey, because it was of later date than thаt propounded by William Bailey, has no foundation, because tbe jury found that both were forgeries.
Tbе fourth assignment of error, that tbe court refused to set aside tbe verdict when requested to do so by аll parties at that time, cannot be sustained. In
Kenny v. R. R.,
No error.