In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
OPINION OF THE COURT
Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Court Administration to every attorney so admitted, must be timely filed and the fee paid regardless of whether the at
Pursuant to this provision, petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order suspending from the practice of law certain attorneys who are in violation of the statute, in that they have failed to file the registration statement and pay the registration fee for one or more registration periods after due notification. This Court has previously held that failure to register, or reregister, and pay the biennial registration fee is professional misconduct warranting discipline (see, Matter of Horoshko,
The attorneys in question have received notification of their noncompliance in the following manner. The Office of Court Administration mailed each of the defaulting attorneys two notices to their last known business. address and one notice to their last known home address. Attorneys who remained in default following these three notices were referred to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, which mailed a notice of an imminent suspension motion to the last known business address of the subject attorney. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated November 25, 1998 (M-7578), which provided for service of the suspension motion by publication in the New York Law Journal for five consecutive days, a list of the defaulting attorneys along with their last known business addresses was so published commencing January 4, 1999. Following publication, the motion was called in open court on January 25, 1999. Those attorneys who remain in noncompliance with
Accordingly, due to the continued failure to comply with the statute, petitioner’s motion to suspend such attorneys shall be
Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ., concur.
Petitioner’s application granted to the extent of suspending from the practice of law in the State of New York those attorneys whose names are enumerated in the schedule attached to the opinion Per Curiam, effective June 7, 1999, and until the further order of this Court, as indicated. [As amended by unpublished orders entered May 27, June 10, 17, 22, July 1, 15, 22, 29, Aug. 5, Sept. 2, 16, 23, Oct. 12, Dec. 7, 21, 1999, Jan. 4 and 20, 2000.]
[[Image here]]