History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
913 N.Y.S.2d 923
N.Y. App. Div.
2011
Check Treatment

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner; THOMAS A. MUSCATELLO, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York

913 N.Y.S.2d 923

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1955, was suspended by this Court‘s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent‘s application.

Respondent‘s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent‘s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 13, 2011
Citation: 913 N.Y.S.2d 923
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In