In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the maternal grandmother appeals from
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.
This appeal must be dismissed as academic because the order appealed from expired by its own terms on March 4, 2005, and was replaced by a subsequent order extending placement (see Matter of Anthony O., 8 AD3d 573 [2004]; Matter of Garth S., 309 AD2d 940, 941 [2003]; Matter of Fatima Me., 292 AD2d 532, 533 [2002]).
Contrary to the appellant’s contentions raised in her supplemental pro se brief, the underlying finding of neglect is not reviewable on this appeal from the order extending placement (see Matter of G. Children, 293 AD2d 470, 471 [2002]). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
