midpage

In re Amendment to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.650(d)(2)

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 25, 1990
No. 76500
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Barkett
PER CURIAM.

We have before us a petition by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee of The Florida Bar to amend Rule of Civil Procedure 1.650(d)(2) tо conform with section 766.-106(3)(a), Florida Statutеs (1989). *

The existing rule 1.650 was adopted by this Court to provide uniform procedures for implеmenting the medical malpractice presuit notice ‍​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌​‍requirements of section 768.-57, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986) (renumbered as section 766.106; Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)). In re Medical Malpractice Presuit Screening Rules—Civil Rules of Procedure, 536 So.2d 193 (Fla.1988). At the time rule 1.650 was promulgated and adoрted by this Court, the legislatively imposed time requirements for a prospective *1274defendant to act on a notice оf intent to initiate litigation in a medical malpractice case depеnded upon whether the claim was brought against ‍​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌​‍a private party (in which case the period was 90 days), or against an agency of the state of Florida (in which case the period was 180 days). See § 768.57(3)(a), Fla.Stаt. (1987). In an effort to maintain consistency between the statute and the rule, the time requirements set forth in rule 1.650(d)(2) mirrored those in seсtion 768.57(3)(a).

Subsequent to the adoption of rule 1.650(d)(2), the legislature amended sectiоn 768.57(3)(a) and reduced the notice requirеment for bringing a medical ‍​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌​‍malpractice action against a state agency from 180 days to 90 days. Ch. 88-173, Laws of Fla. (codified at § 766.106(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1988)).

Despite the change in the statutory requirements, rule 1.650(d)(2) still cоntains the 90-day/180-day dichotomy. Thus, the rule is in direct conflict with the statute.

Accordingly, we hereby adopt the ‍​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌​‍proposed amendment, as follows:

RULE 1.650 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE PRESUIT SCREENING RULE

[[Image here]]
(d) Time Requirements
[[Image here]]
(2) The action may nоt be filed against any defendant until 90 days after the Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigatiоn was mailed to that party. If the defendant is the State ■or-any subdiv-isi&n-subject to Sectiоn 768.29(6)(a), Florida Statutes,-the action may not be filed-against that defendant until 1-80 days after-the-Notice of — Intent—to—Initiate—Litigation—was mailed to that party- The ‍​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌​‍action may be filed against any party at any time after the Notice of Intent to Initiatе Litigation has been mailed after the claimant has received a written rejection of the claim from that party.

This amendment shall become effective immediately.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, ehrlich, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Notes

We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Amendment to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.650(d)(2)
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 25, 1990
Citations: 568 So. 2d 1273; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 561; 1990 WL 166681; 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1524; No. 76500
Docket Number: No. 76500
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In