PARTIAL RULING ON MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT AGAINST PETITIONING CREDITOR FOR COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES
I.
Allen-Main Associates Limited Partnership (“Allen-Main”) has moved for a supplemental judgment against CC Britain Equities, L.L.C. (“CC Britain”) for additional costs and a reasonable attorney’s fee in a case where the cоurt has dismissed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition brought by CC Britain against Allen-Main. Allen-Main seeks a supplementаl judgment for $35,-460.24 which it claims represents, in part, costs and attorney’s fees it incurred in defending before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Second Circuit (“the BAP”) two appeals taken by CC Britain. Bоth appeals arose from judgments of the bankruptcy court (1) dismissing the involuntary petition and (2) granting Allen-Main costs and attorney’s fees of $13,320.56 pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 303(i)(l) (“If the court dismisses a petition ... the court may grant judgment — (1) against the petitioner and in favor of the debtor for (A) costs; and (B) a reasonable attorney’s fee.”) The BAP, in a ruling at
II.
Solely at issue in this ruling is the authority vel non of the bankruptcy сourt to award attorney’s fees and costs incurred in an appeal from the bankruptcy cоurt. Allen-Main asserts such authority is implicit in the provisions of § 303(f)(1). CC Britain denies this court possesses such authority.
III.
Thе court concludes that Alien-Main’s motion as to the stated issue must be denied on the basis that a bankruрtcy court does not have statutory authority to award attorney’s fees and costs incurred in an appeal from the bankruptcy court. No such authority can reasonably be extracted frоm the provisions of § 303(i), and Allen-Main cites no other persuasive authority.
On the other hand, there are relevant rulings in both the Ninth Circuit and the Second Circuit that Bankruptcy Code §
523(d)
1
,
The court can conceive of no reasonable basis to distinguish the rulings under § 523(d) from a ruling under § 303(i). Allen-Main, in its brief, cites two bankruptcy court rulings 4 where appeal-related costs and attorney’s fees were considered by the bankruptcy court under § 303(i). However, there was no issue raised as to the bankruptcy court’s authority in those proceedings and the precedential value, accordingly, is lacking.
IV.
For the reasons stated, that portion of Alien-Main’s motion which refers to appeal-related costs and attorney’s fees is denied. The clerk of the court will reschedule Allen Main’s motion in order to consider the remaining matters raised by the motion.
It is SO ORDERED.
Notes
. Section 523(d) provides:
If a creditor requests a determination of dis-chargeability of a consumer debt under subsection (a)(2) of this section, аnd such debt is discharged, the court shall grant judgment in favor of the debtor for the costs of, and a reasonable attorney's fee for, the proceeding if the court finds that the position of the creditor was not substantially justified, except that the court shall not award such costs and fees ifspecial circumstances would make the award unjust.
11 U.S.C.A. § 523(d).
. Rule 38 states, “If а court of appeals determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may ... award just damages аnd single or double costs to the appellee.” Fed.R.App.P. 38.
. Rule 8020 states:
If a district court or bankruptcy aрpellate panel determines that an appeal from an order, judgment or decreе of a bankruptcy judge is frivolous, it may, after a separately filed motion or notice from tire district court or bankruptcy appellate panel and reasonable opportunity to respond, award just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.
Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8020.
. In re Atlas Machine and Iron Works, Inc.,
