In re Alexander L.
Since the July 10, 2012 permanency order changed the permanency goal for the child from return to mother to adoption, it is not moot (see Matter of Jacelyn TT. [Tonia TT.—Carlton TT.], 80 AD3d 1119 [3d Dept 2011]). On the merits, the court properly found that petitioner agency met its burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the change in Alexander‘s goal was appropriate (see Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059 [2d Dept 2012]). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.