In Ja Kim v. Dong Hee HanIn Ja Kim v. Dong Hee Han
Ordered that the order entered March 9, 2006 is reversed, on the law, the motion pursuant to
Ordered that the appeal from the order entered October 17, 2006 is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion, in effect, for leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit.
Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.