History
  • No items yet
midpage
Imrie v. United States
38 F.2d 634
10th Cir.
1930
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment forfeiting an automobile, under the provisions of section 26, tit. 2, of the National Prohibition Act, section 40, tit. 27, U. S. C. (27 USCA § 40). Errors assigned are all predicated upon trial proceedings, which can be brought into the record only by proper bill of exceptions, duly approved and signed by the trial court. No such bill of exceptions appears in this record. On the contrary, there is a literal transcript of the evidence and other trial proceedings. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631. In the absence of a proper bill of exceptions, we cannot consider the errors assigned. Davis v. United States, supra.

The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Imrie v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 8, 1930
Citation: 38 F.2d 634
Docket Number: No. 66
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.