History
  • No items yet
midpage
Imperatrice v. Imperatrice
298 N.Y. 549
NY
1948
Check Treatment

Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants' motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American TobaccoCo., 296 N.Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach Moore, Inc.,239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action, nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.

The order should be affirmed, with costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur; CONWAY, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Imperatrice v. Imperatrice
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 16, 1948
Citation: 298 N.Y. 549
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.