583 N.E.2d 1355 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1989
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Pickaway County Probate Court awarding attorney fees to the attorney representing the Estate of Mary M. White. We reverse.
The executor of Mary White's estate, Norbert W. Cowan, hired R. Douglas Wrightsel as special counsel to the executor in a will contest action brought by appellee, Doris J. Imler. At the time Wrightsel was hired, he sent a letter to Cowan outlining the terms of his representation. Wrightsel indicated that he would be billing at an hourly rate of $125 per hour but that if any of the work was delegable to paralegals or associates then Wrightsel would bill at a lower hourly rate. Cowan, as executor of the estate, agreed to the fee arrangement.
Wrightsel and members of his firm spent one hundred forty hours on the matter. Pursuant to R.C.
The trial court awarded Wrightsel the $258 in expenses but only allowed Wrightsel $7,000 in attorney fees. The trial court reached this amount by *361 multiplying the minimum hourly rate of $50 (the minimal rate for paralegal services) by the one hundred and forty hours for which Wrightsel billed.
Wrightsel appeals the trial court's decision and assigns two errors.
The parties agree that R.C.
Appellant contends that the court's award of $7,000 in attorney fees does not reflect the reasonable value of the services performed and is against the manifest weight of the evidence. We agree.
Ohio case law has firmly established that the burden is upon the attorney seeking fees to introduce into the record sufficient evidence of the services performed and of the reasonable value of such services. In re Estate of Verbeck
(1962),
An appellate court will not reverse a trial court's decision unless it is clearly against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgments supported by some competent credible evidence will not be reversed by a reviewing court as being against the manifest weight of the evidence. Seasons Coal Co. v.Cleveland (1984),
Wrightsel contends that because he and Cowan agreed to a fee arrangement, the court must follow the terms of that agreement. We note that such fee agreements are in no way binding upon a probate court. In re Cercone (1969),
As stated above, the probate court must look at all of the evidence to determine the reasonable value of an attorney services. If those services have been properly rendered, then an attorney should be paid for the reasonable value of those services. Here, there is only the trial court's unexplained and unsupported refusal to pay a reasonable request for reasonable attorney fees.
An appellate court may not and will not reverse a trial court's decision unless there has been an abuse of discretion. An abuse of discretion has been defined by the Ohio Supreme Court as "a decision which is arbitrary, unreasonable or unconscionable." Sandusky Properties v. Aveni (1984),
Here, the trial court's refusal to allow the entire amount requested by Wrightsel was arbitrary and unreasonable. Wrightsel's second assignment of error is well taken and is sustained. The decision of the trial court is reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to the court to pay the entire amount of attorney fees requested by Wrightsel.
Judgment reversedand cause remanded.
HOMER E. ABELE, P.J., and STEPHENSON, J., concur. *363