Iman v. State, 784 So. 2d 1265

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court sentenced appellant under the habitual felony offender statute, section 775.084(1)(a), (4)(a), Florida Statutes (1999), and the violent career criminal statute, section 775.084(1)(d), (4)(d), Florida Statutes (1999), appellant has shown no double jeopardy violation because he will serve only one sentence with a minimum mandatory term, as provided for by the violent career criminal statute. Cf. Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000) (holding that two concurrent sentences, pursuant to the prison releasee reoffender statute and the habitual felony offender statute, imposed upon appellant for a single offense, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Iman v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 29, 2001

Citations: 784 So. 2d 1265; 2001 WL 567608; 1D00-2848

Docket Number: 1D00-2848

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.