173 So. 87 | Ala. | 1937
Complainant, a remote vendee, seeks reformation of a mortgage in his chain of title, executed by defendant Edd Ikard to J. S. Ikard, complainant's grantor, and the bill comes clearly within the influence of our statutes. Sections 6960-6962, Code, 1923; Woodlawn Realty Development Co. v. Hawkins,
The bill as amended sufficiently avers the mutuality of the mistake (Eastis v. Beasley,
There was no error in overruling the demurrer to the amended bill, and the decree is accordingly here affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.