History
  • No items yet
midpage
Iguanti v. Kronish
276 N.Y.S.2d 130
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1966
Check Treatment
Charles A. Loreto, J.

Plaintiff having obtained a judgment against the defendant, is proceeding by way of supplementary proceedings to satisfy his judgment. The latter has instituted a negligence lawsuit against a third party, defended by the Allstate Insurance Company.

Plaintiff here seeks by way of “ restraining notices” to restrain payment of the proceeds which may be paid to this defendant in that suit whether by settlement or by judgment. By this motion, the defendant seeks to vacate the restraining notices. CPLR 5222 provides for the use of restraining notices against property against which money judgments may be enforced. And CPLR 5201 (subds. [a], [b]) permit the enforcement of money judgments “ against any property which could be assigned or transferred, whether it consists of a present or future right or interest and whether or not it is vested ”.

The General Obligations Law (§ 13-101) forbids the assignment of a claim to recover damages for personal injuries. However, the Appellate Division in Grossman v. Schlosser (19 A D 2d 893) distinguished between an assignment and 11 proceeds ” of a personal injury case, holding that such proceeds are validly transferable. Therefore the proceeds of a personal injury action fall within the purview of CPLR 5201 and their transfer may be restrained. The motion is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Iguanti v. Kronish
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 2, 1966
Citation: 276 N.Y.S.2d 130
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.