IE Miller of Eunice, Inc. v. Source Petroleum, Inc.IE Miller of Eunice, Inc. v. Source Petroleum, Inc.
I.E. MILLER OF EUNICE, INC.
v.
SOURCE PETROLEUM, INC.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Raymond A. Beyt, Beyt & Beyt, Lafayette, for applicant.
Jacque B. Pucheu, Jr., Pucheu & Pucheu, Eunice, for respondent.
CALOGERO, Justice.
We granted writs in this case to consider defendant/relator's contention that the Court of Appeal erred in affirming the trial court decision that a lien not recorded within ninety days[1] under the Oil, Gas, and Water Well Lien Act, R.S. 9:4861-4867, was nonetheless valid.
The case was consolidated for argument with Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Company, No. 86-C-0958. We have this day rendered a judgment in that case, along with an opinion which addresses the above question as it affects the litigants in both argued cases.
Decree
For the reasons given in the opinion handed down this day in Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.,
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED.
MARCUS, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
LEMMON, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
COLE, J., dissents for reasons assigned by LEMMON, J.
MARCUS, Justice (dissenting).
Reading
LEMMON, Justice, dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons assigned in Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Company,
NOTES
Notes
[1] 1983 La. Acts 374 amended R.S. 4862 to increase the recordation period from ninety days to one hundred eighty days. Applicable to this case was the pre-1983 time period of ninety days. Here, I.E. Miller filed its lien eight months (over ninety days) after the completion of their rigging down and hauling service for Source Petroleum's contractor, Aamwell Workover Services, Inc., but it did file suit within one year of its service.