History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ickes v. Fox
300 U.S. 640
SCOTUS
1937
Check Treatment

It is ordered by this Court that the opinion of this Court in these cases be, and it hereby is, amended as follows:

That the word “so” in line 6 from the bottom of page .1 be transposed to follow the word “suits” in the same line; and that there be inserted between the words “affect” and “the” in line 6 from the bottom of page 1, the words “the extent or measure of the rights of the respective respondents or” so that the sentence will read: “The allegations of the three second-amended bills of complaint differ in some particulars; but whether these differences will affect the extent or measure of the rights of the respective respondents or the final disposition of the suits so as to require unlike decrees, we do not determine.”

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Ickes v. Fox
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 1, 1937
Citation: 300 U.S. 640
Docket Number: No. 266; No. 267; No. 268
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.