Iazzetta v. VicenziIazzetta v. Vicenzi
In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated October 17, 1996, which denied their motion to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness filed by the plaintiff on or about June 20, 1996, and granted the plaintiffs cross motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered February 20, 1996, which dismissed the complaint pursuant to
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the plaintiffs cross motion is denied.
A case in the Supreme Court which is stricken from the calendar and not restored within one year thereafter, “shall be deemed abandoned and shall be dismissed without costs for neglect to prosecute” (
It is well settled that in order to vacate a dismissal pursuant to